From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Pretest?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:47:43 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HLbWJ-0005j7-8h@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17890.18514.686146.829769@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172479796 21002 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 08:49:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:49:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 09:49:50 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HLbYL-0005Lu-K3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:49:49 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLbYL-00036N-6d
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:49:49 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLbXq-00030v-SD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:49:18 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLbXq-00030X-32
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:49:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLbXp-00030S-UY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:49:17 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLbXp-00084U-4s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:49:17 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HLbWJ-0005j7-8h; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:47:43 -0500
In-reply-to: <17890.18514.686146.829769@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from
	Nick Roberts on Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:39:14 +1300)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66831
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66831>

    If the release really will be soon, how about forking at the same time and
    imposing a formal approval procedure on the release branch to prevent
    unnecessary, and possibly adverse, commits?

I would rather keep Emacs 22 in the trunk until we release it.