From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More visible mini-buffer prompt face Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:27:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <45DF1547.8010404@gmail.com> <7dbe73ed0702240958s6a54086bv1c6d2664571ea6bc@mail.gmail.com> <7dbe73ed0702250301m62343f14vb647e8de4806c772@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172460575 5232 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 03:29:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Mathias Dahl" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 04:29:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLWYK-00076G-3j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:29:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLWYK-00086C-0z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLWXi-0007vS-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:28:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLWXh-0007uc-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:28:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLWXh-0007uU-8Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:28:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLWXh-0005Pt-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:28:49 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HLWWB-0005Fn-7m; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:27:15 -0500 In-reply-to: <7dbe73ed0702250301m62343f14vb647e8de4806c772@mail.gmail.com> (mathias.dahl@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66814 Archived-At: Do you refer to the fact that you have to type the more "difficult" string "yes" + enter, instead of just typing "y"? Yes. In my case I often do arrow-up + enter, because in 99 cases of 100, the last response I made was "yes", so it does not really make it much harder for me to do something wrong (because I am forming a habit). I suggest you stop that practice.