From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fix needed for communication with gpg-agent Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:35:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87irdzs6pp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fy91g1pl.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87wt2dk2rv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <873b4yt7xx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172259468 25100 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2007 19:37:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, wk@gnupg.org, miles@gnu.org, ueno@unixuser.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 23 20:37:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HKgEe-0008Jh-6T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:37:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKgEd-0007Rp-S2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:37:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HKgEQ-0007RX-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:37:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HKgEQ-0007RI-Ha for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:37:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKgEQ-0007RC-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:37:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HKgEP-0006MS-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:37:25 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HKgCw-0005Z7-Gc; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:35:54 -0500 In-reply-to: <873b4yt7xx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:31:54 -0500) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66699 Archived-At: The motive for using gpg-agent and pinentry is to avoid ever having the passphrase inside Emacs. Wouldn't communicating with pinentry as an Emacs subprocess defeat the purpose?