From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Indentation of constants in LISP
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:20:49 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HKHcf-0001Cs-2Z@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <13329186.795071172111069001.JavaMail.www@wwinf4204>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172164960 27287 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2007 17:22:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: alinsoar@voila.fr
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 22 18:22:33 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HKHeL-00015y-Fe
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:22:33 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKHeK-0000Tf-SV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:22:32 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKHe8-0000T2-1w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:22:20 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKHe7-0000Si-Jt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:22:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKHe7-0000Sf-Et
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:22:19 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HKHe7-0003bV-1G
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:22:19 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HKHcf-0001Cs-2Z; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:20:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <13329186.795071172111069001.JavaMail.www@wwinf4204> (message
	from A Soare on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:24:29 +0100 (CET))
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66628
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66628>

    There are simply different definitions. Maybe there was 2 persons:
    one wrote the indentation for a region, and the other for a line.

Yes, but the two commands are SUPPOSED to indent everything the same way.
If they do it differently, I think that is a bug.

Can you state a precise test case for this bug?