From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: NT icons
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:23:55 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HIJvH-0004HL-PI@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <8764a7oxbu.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1HH0V7-000166-C1@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<c8ire47ahb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <gmejos79yh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<uodnw3v74.fsf@gnu.org> <E1HHmjM-00065I-Iw@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87wt2i5688.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171697140 4924 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2007 07:25:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:25:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 17 08:25:33 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HIJwr-0000gw-6p
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:25:33 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HIJwq-00049z-In
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:25:32 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HIJwf-00048R-4Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:25:21 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HIJwd-00046R-Tv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:25:20 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HIJwd-00046I-RE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:25:19 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HIJwd-0003wV-IR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:25:19 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HIJvH-0004HL-PI; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:23:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <87wt2i5688.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:04:39 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66474
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66474>

    Since the chances of any infringing code showing up is so small, I
    suggest leaving the remainder of the copyright audit till after the
    Emacs 22 release.  It should not hold the release.

This issue is very important, and I will do it right.  Most of it is
done already, though, so I'm sure you can wait for the rest.