From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: NT icons
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:57:24 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HHmjM-00065I-Iw@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <8764a7oxbu.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1HH0V7-000166-C1@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<c8ire47ahb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <gmejos79yh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<uodnw3v74.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171569547 29535 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2007 19:59:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:59:07 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 15 20:58:59 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HHmkt-00033p-IU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:58:59 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HHmkt-0002Z9-4Q
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:58:59 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HHmki-0002Yh-5Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:58:48 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HHmkh-0002YS-6F
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:58:47 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HHmkg-0002YN-Ve
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:58:46 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HHmkg-0006kM-MH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:58:46 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HHmjM-00065I-Iw; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:57:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <uodnw3v74.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 15
	Feb 2007 06:23:43 +0200)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66433
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66433>

    That should teach us a lesson not to delete anything without a good
    faith effort to prove that it doesn't have valid copyright
    assignment.

I agree.  When something looks dubious, we shoulc check the facts
rather than rush to delete it.