From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: cannot understand Elisp manual node Glyphs
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:53:42 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HGfN0-0007HY-4o@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMCENOCOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1HFwDZ-0000YH-6m@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3hcts1jzd.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171302997 26553 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2007 17:56:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:56:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 12 18:56:21 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HGfPO-0003F2-Oc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:56:10 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HGfPO-0002oT-Df
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:56:10 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HGfOH-0002O2-6Z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:55:01 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HGfOG-0002Ne-KI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:55:00 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HGfOG-0002NZ-GH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:55:00 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HGfOG-00016y-5L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:55:00 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HGfN0-0007HY-4o; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:53:42 -0500
In-reply-to: <m3hcts1jzd.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66298
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66298>

    To me, it makes no sense to keep the current description of glyph
    codes in Emacs 22 when we _KNOW_ that code based on the current text
    will _NOT_ work in Emacs 23.

    Replacing the text with the text I wrote would give a clean transition

Ok.  Please make the change.