From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image mode Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:41:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> <87lkjcttv5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <45C77904.8080308@gnu.org> <87hcu0l909.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d54otndk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170877498 16380 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2007 19:44:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 07 20:44:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEsig-0006Rf-B2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:44:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEsif-00026j-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:44:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEsgX-0001Am-E7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:42:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEsgX-0001A8-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:42:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEsgW-00019p-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HEsgW-0000g0-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HEsfN-0004O8-EC; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:41:17 -0500 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66080 Archived-At: > The point is not what technical position you were arguing for. My point was that my "sharp words" were an answer to personal attack. I didn't notice that previous personal attack, but if there was one, that also shouldn't have been made. However, please try not to respond to a personal attack by attacking back.