From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image mode Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:37:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> <7dbe73ed0702050647y15d4ed7cu381a869cd2e835f3@mail.gmail.com> <87lkjcttv5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <45C77904.8080308@gnu.org> <87hcu0l909.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d54otndk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170812341 28144 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2007 01:39:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 07 02:38:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEblt-0003Cp-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:38:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEblt-0005Kb-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:38:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEblg-0005JZ-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:38:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEblf-0005JL-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:38:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEblf-0005JH-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:38:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HEblf-0007xQ-F0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:38:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HEbkX-0000zE-RB; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:37:29 -0500 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66057 Archived-At: I don't remember precisely which message, but it was one where you used some sharp words. The point is not what technical position you were arguing for. It was HOW you said it. If you state the same position in kinder words, it would be fine.