From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Indentation of constants in LISP
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:19:53 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HDIvx-0004pa-4M@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <23847250.4061170433063829.JavaMail.www@wwinf4103>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170501761 16734 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2007 11:22:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:22:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: alinsoar@voila.fr
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 12:22:33 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HDIyW-0001i2-Gs
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 12:22:32 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIyV-0004AM-Tm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:22:31 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIx0-0003Cs-ER
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:58 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIwz-0003CR-T4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:58 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDIwz-0003CE-Ne
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:57 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HDIwz-0007CU-IE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:57 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HDIvx-0004pa-4M; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:19:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <23847250.4061170433063829.JavaMail.www@wwinf4103> (message from
	A Soare on Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:17:43 +0100 (CET))
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65821
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65821>

This is an interesting idea.

thingatpt is not normally loaded, so it would be better to avoid using
it here.  It should not be needed here, since the code is not trying
to find the whole symbol name, just checking that there is one.  Can
you rewrite it to use looking-at instead of thing-at-point?