From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: URL not following some 302 redirects after recent changes
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:19:31 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HDIvb-0004mc-Sg@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <871wnw2opm.fsf@x3y2z1.net> <87tzy7wbsj.fsf@x3y2z1.net>
	<87bqkek9s7.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1HCwYt-0006K1-M2@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<871wl8xz8t.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170501729 16658 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2007 11:22:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:22:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: mange@freemail.hu, disumu@x3y2z1.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 12:22:02 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HDIy2-0001SF-7g
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 12:22:02 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIy1-0003la-JQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:22:01 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIwf-0002pa-BF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:37 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIwe-0002ou-HD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDIwe-0002om-8K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:36 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HDIwd-00076u-Ua
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:36 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HDIvb-0004mc-Sg; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:19:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <871wl8xz8t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:09:38 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65820
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65820>

Your patch looks good.

I just wonder now whether an interger such as 0 would be a better
choice than a symbol such as `sentinel-inhibited'.  We could tell
people not to define `sentinel-inhibited' as a sentinel function, but
if we use 0, we don't need to tell people not to define it as a
function, because it isn't possible to do so.