From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:48:18 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HBG0g-0002gp-1c@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0701220813n15bf9ehf0b27940717e3e03@mail.gmail.com>
	<buozm8am5u8.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com>
	<je8xfo9yzl.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <je4pqc9y6y.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<f7ccd24b0701270936r5950880cj9742cd1f122c4a83@mail.gmail.com>
	<jwvr6tg2jro.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <jer6tg83iq.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<m3ps909els.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170013802 1696 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2007 19:50:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: schwab@suse.de, miles@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, lekktu@gmail.com
To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 28 20:49:55 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HBG2F-0004jJ-2S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:49:55 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HBG2E-0006I0-O9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:54 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HBG1c-00063k-BM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:16 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HBG1c-00063Y-0z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:16 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBG1b-00063V-RU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:15 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HBG1b-0000yF-Fc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:49:15 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HBG0g-0002gp-1c; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:48:18 -0500
In-reply-to: <m3ps909els.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65570
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65570>

    So using a hash table would improve performance significantly ...
    But now is not the time to make that change.

I agree.