From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:34:23 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H2bAF-0003K1-4O@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1H1qoi-0001av-Hq@monty-python.gnu.org> <u8xglozru.fsf@gnu.org>
	<459BB893.9010106@gnu.org> <E1H2IOI-0002Xm-L3@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<8764bns96l.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> <459CE689.3020006@swipnet.se>
	<m3d55vq8q5.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167950317 31787 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2007 22:38:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:38:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	md5i@cs.cmu.edu
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 23:38:33 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H2bEE-0001Zj-Sh
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:38:31 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2bEE-0007UH-6e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:38:30 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2bAe-00045k-4A
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:34:48 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2bAd-00045G-Ey
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:34:47 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2bAd-000456-6a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:34:47 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2bAc-00082D-SO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:34:46 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H2bAF-0003K1-4O; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:34:23 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3d55vq8q5.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64782
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/64782>

    > So is Ctrl-C/V/X really part of CUA at all?

    If you enable CUA mode it is :-)

There is a miscommunication here.  He is not asking about the Emacs
CUA mode.  He's asking about what was in the spec that the MS Windows
designers started with.

Lennart Borgman wrote:

    I found someone saying that is was added in CUA 2.0. I have a vauge 
    memory of seeing something like that before too.

If that is true, what was the date of CUA 2.0?  And did MS Windows
copy those commands from CUA 2.0?