From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.auctex.devel,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k60b7hv5.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87sley46bb.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87wt491b46.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <854praka6x.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <861wmdq3et.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <8664boo5rs.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167878122 22034 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2007 02:35:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 02:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 03:35:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2IRr-0001Eq-Fu for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:35:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2IRp-0005Cp-TI for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:35:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2IOn-0003GT-Tv for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2IOn-0003FU-5I for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2IOm-0003FL-OM; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2IOm-0003nG-Ey; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1H2IOQ-0002Z3-LO; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:46 -0500 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <8664boo5rs.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:48:07 +0100) X-BeenThere: auctex-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AUCTeX developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.auctex.devel:1515 gmane.emacs.devel:64730 Archived-At: > However, moving it into the AUCTeX repository creates a possible > specific risk. Namely, the risk that AUCTeX contributors who have not > signed papers might put changes into RefTeX also. No, that risk does not exist. We don't give CVS access to AUCTeX developers not having signed papers. The assignment problems of AUCTeX only concern old code, and not all of it (for example, preview-latex, a subsystem of AUCTeX, is completely covered). Ok, I am satisfied on this score. > Given that RefTeX has a separate repository already, I don't think > there is any harm in moving it, as such. (I already said so.) It hasn't: Carsten has worked on it basically without version control or at least version logs at home. He considered the history in the Emacs ChangeLog to be much more relevant than what he got himself. In that case, I think this will be, to a certain extent, a step back. But we can live with it. So we can drop this topic.