From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:38 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H2IOI-0002Xm-L3@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1H1qoi-0001av-Hq@monty-python.gnu.org> <u8xglozru.fsf@gnu.org>
	<459BB893.9010106@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167877973 21661 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2007 02:32:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 02:32:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 03:32:51 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H2IPQ-0000Tr-D4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:32:48 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2IPP-0003XF-OY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:47 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2IOf-00038a-Lb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:01 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2IOe-00037p-Se
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:00 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2IOe-00037X-FQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:00 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2IOe-0003m0-7r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:00 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H2IOI-0002Xm-L3; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:38 -0500
Original-To: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <459BB893.9010106@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Wed, 03
	Jan 2007 14:07:15 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64726
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/64726>

    I suggest that at least the above sentence must be removed, as it 
    incorrectly gives the designers of Windows credit for the CUA standard.

Who did design that specification?