From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should `auto-coding-functions' be mode-specific?
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:30 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H2IOA-0002Wy-NM@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87ejqd88iv.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com>
	<E1H1wtz-0007DZ-5Z@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<20070103120901.GC3554@vin.lip.ens-lyon.fr>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167877931 21584 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2007 02:32:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 02:32:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: vincent@vinc17.org, romain@orebokech.com, handa@m17n.org,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 03:32:10 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H2IOn-0000JL-N0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:32:09 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2IOm-00034F-Nq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:32:08 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2IOY-000340-RR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:54 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2IOX-00033o-Fz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:53 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2IOX-00033l-A0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:53 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2IOX-0003lN-2a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:53 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H2IOA-0002Wy-NM; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:31:30 -0500
Original-To: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org>
In-reply-to: <20070103120901.GC3554@vin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> (message from Vincent
	Lefevre on Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:09:01 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64725
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/64725>

    This explains the problem. But anyway, there was some text before
    the HTML code, meaning that the HTML code was included in some text
    file. So, in this case, I don't think taking the charset from the
    META header is a correct behavior.

That criterion is perhaps feasible to implement.
Handa, what do you think?