From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with the url package on w32? Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:57:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871wnnclkz.fsf@freemail.hu> <87lkltztzy.fsf@freemail.hu> <871wniv89d.fsf@freemail.hu> <87wt5825wh.fsf@freemail.hu> <45887987.3040105@student.lu.se> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166597888 21725 80.91.229.10 (20 Dec 2006 06:58:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 07:58:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GwvOt-0004E8-Dq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:58:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwvOs-0003kZ-VA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwvOg-0003kU-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwvOe-0003kI-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwvOe-0003kF-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:57:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GwvOe-0007md-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:57:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GwvOd-0008Kj-N9; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:57:47 -0500 Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63980 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:54:00 +0100 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I never apply a patch from inside Emacs. I do, but I do it with "M-|", not with Ediff. > When the patch is not kosher > (spaces changed by your e-mail program, crlf/lf issues, etc.) it is > perfectly possible to get "hunk applied" messages for hunks that > weren't really applied. Never had such problems with my method, since the shell command output is displayed by M-|.