From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Documenting gpg-agent
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:59:50 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GwKu6-00014u-80@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Gtmcp-00089k-4r@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m2y7p6xsym.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de> <m2odq2cpwj.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166463766 1816 80.91.229.2 (18 Dec 2006 17:42:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 18 18:42:44 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GwKva-0007ha-SO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:01:23 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GwKva-0004ZL-Hj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:01:22 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GwKu9-0003xp-5v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:59:53 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GwKu8-0003xA-37
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:59:52 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwKu7-0003wv-RN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:59:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GwKu7-0008NC-8R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:59:51 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GwKu6-00014u-80; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:59:50 -0500
Original-To: Sascha Wilde <wilde@sha-bang.de>
In-reply-to: <m2odq2cpwj.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de> (message from Sascha Wilde on
	Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:56:28 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63925
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/63925>

    Since GnuPG2 and therefor gpg-agent is released, and we are
    recommending its use: should we change the default value of
    pgg-gpg-use-agent to t?

    When no agent is available the old passphrase input/caching will still
    be used as a fallback so changing the default should not do much harm.

That seems like the right thing, but I don't really know anything
about this, so I can't be sure.  Please let's wait a few days to see
if anyone presents a valid objection.