From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:25:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165627600 29459 80.91.229.10 (9 Dec 2006 01:26:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: herberteuler@hotmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 09 02:26:38 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gsqz8-0008V4-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 02:26:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsqz7-0004b8-Jq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GsqyS-0004ET-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GsqyR-0004DU-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GsqyR-0004DE-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GsqyR-000090-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1GsqyP-0001py-Dr; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:25:53 -0500 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:44:32 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63480 Archived-At: > But longlines-mode uses an after-change-function to reformat inserted > text, so that should take care of all possible situations. > Yes, but would this change be active only in Longlines mode? Well, that was one of the motivation for my suggestion: make sure that it can be implemented all in longlines-mode without impacting anything else. I'm talking about the proposal to change the subroutine fill-newline. That is not in longlines.el, so unless we do something special to make it work only when Longlines mode is enabled, it will apply all the time. That's what I thought the idea was.