From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with the url package on w32? Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:15:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871wnnclkz.fsf@freemail.hu> <87lkltztzy.fsf@freemail.hu> <871wniv89d.fsf@freemail.hu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165115795 11639 80.91.229.2 (3 Dec 2006 03:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 03:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 03 04:16:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqhqD-0006bM-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:16:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqhqD-0000ig-28 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:16:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gqhok-0007y2-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gqhoj-0007xV-Rc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gqhoj-0007xE-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gqhoj-0005Ay-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Gqhoi-0003QZ-Sj; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:15:00 -0500 Original-To: Magnus Henoch In-reply-to: <871wniv89d.fsf@freemail.hu> (message from Magnus Henoch on Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:37:18 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63241 Archived-At: > 1. Make non-blocking connections work on Windows. > 2. Make (featurep 'make-network-process '(:nowait t)) return nil on > Windows. > 3. Document that make-network-process returns nil if it fails to > create a non-blocking socket. > 4. Make make-network-socket do a blocking connect if a non-blocking > connect fails, and document that. Why not make it signal an error if it can't do what was requested?