From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:59:51 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Gm8kZ-0003Tz-8w@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BAY112-F24F8B4212E2B9EC4E7AD98DAEF0@phx.gbl>
	<jwvhcww8db4.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1Glm5N-0008SX-Gi@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvodr371ih.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164027699 24259 80.91.229.2 (20 Nov 2006 13:01:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:01:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, herberteuler@hotmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 20 14:01:38 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gm8m7-0005jA-NN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:01:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gm8m7-00019H-2d
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:01:27 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gm8kc-0007xk-6q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:59:54 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gm8ka-0007vA-TZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:59:52 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm8ka-0007uk-HG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:59:52 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gm8ka-00052t-FH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:59:52 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Gm8kZ-0003Tz-8w; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:59:51 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwvodr371ih.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:09:57 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62559
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/62559>

    > But how much of a speedup does it give?  Would someone like to try
    > some real cases with large files and see if there is any case
    > where this really matters?

    I haven't bothered to test,

I would like someone to test this so I can see for sure.