From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:37:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87slggjtbb.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <455F9024.8080000@student.lu.se> <17759.43936.82301.353794@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85irhbg6zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17760.11257.78362.216206@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85wt5reo3b.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163986717 15600 80.91.229.2 (20 Nov 2006 01:38:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, nickrob@snap.net.nz, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 20 02:38:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gly7H-0000GF-Sg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:38:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gly7H-0001n5-Dk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:38:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gly6Q-0001EX-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gly6P-0001Dc-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:37:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gly6P-0001DR-9w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:37:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gly6P-0001bf-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:37:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Gly6N-0000kB-NY; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:37:40 -0500 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85wt5reo3b.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:18:48 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62521 Archived-At: It seems like we have completely different recollections of events. As far as I remember, Richard oked getting emacsclient to work on Windows even after the first pretest (where emacsclient was not yet a part of Emacs). These changes were installed without properly asking me, and they should not have been. However, later I was told they had been made to work correctly, and decided it was ok to leave them installed. Are there any problems with the _current_ code? If so, what are they?