From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:59:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1GlhaH-00087k-UJ@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY112-F24F8B4212E2B9EC4E7AD98DAEF0@phx.gbl> (herberteuler@hotmail.com)
The usual way to solve a problem where two different modes
want to enable a certain feature, and it should only be disabled
when both modes are disabled, is to create two variables
each of which enables the feature when non-nil. Then each mode
can set its own variable.
This sort of method
>I suppose it would be cleaner to require minor modes that want to turn
>on/off `parse-sexp-lookup-properties' in a buffer append/remove their
>name from/to that variable and kill it iff that list gets empty.
is ok if no simpler method will work. However, using
`parse-sexp-lookup-properties' this way would require changing all
modes that set it. We can't reliably do that, since some of them may
not be included in Emacs.
Therefore, it could be better to create a new variable to be used this
way, alongside `parse-sexp-lookup-properties'. If either variable
is non-nil, then parse-sexp would check the properties.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-19 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-13 5:24 Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines Herbert Euler
2006-11-13 5:52 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-13 10:12 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-13 20:15 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-14 1:35 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-15 3:14 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-13 19:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-14 1:19 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-14 6:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-14 7:35 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-14 15:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-15 1:32 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-15 3:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-15 4:24 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-16 6:22 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-30 6:36 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-30 14:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-12-02 17:56 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-07 18:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-12-08 5:04 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-08 7:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-12-09 1:25 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-09 3:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-12-09 18:25 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-15 4:37 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-15 7:26 ` Miles Bader
2006-11-15 14:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-15 15:47 ` Johan Bockgård
2006-11-15 16:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-16 15:01 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-16 15:01 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-23 9:33 ` Johan Bockgård
2006-11-14 12:27 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-14 15:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-15 22:58 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-13 20:15 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-14 1:42 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-14 8:36 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-14 11:38 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-14 15:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-16 6:23 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-16 8:42 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-16 10:47 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-16 12:18 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-16 12:37 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-16 12:57 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-16 15:12 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-16 16:03 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-17 1:24 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-17 2:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-17 1:36 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-16 14:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-17 6:30 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-17 18:39 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-18 0:51 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-18 14:34 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-18 15:21 ` Miles Bader
2006-11-19 11:11 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-19 18:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-20 1:37 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-20 3:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-20 23:57 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-21 0:03 ` David Kastrup
2006-11-22 13:15 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-22 13:50 ` David Kastrup
2006-11-24 22:49 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-26 11:42 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-11-26 12:08 ` David Kastrup
2006-11-26 18:32 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-11-26 19:53 ` David Kastrup
2006-12-05 17:43 ` David Reitter
2006-12-06 14:24 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-08 9:03 ` David Reitter
2006-11-20 7:39 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-20 10:13 ` David Kastrup
2006-11-20 7:09 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-20 8:03 ` martin rudalics
2006-11-19 0:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-19 12:47 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-19 18:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-20 12:59 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-21 3:45 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-22 13:15 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-23 3:27 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-26 2:01 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-27 1:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-29 4:06 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-29 4:08 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-29 4:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-29 7:36 ` Herbert Euler
2006-11-29 11:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-11-30 3:20 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-29 8:13 ` David Kastrup
2006-11-19 7:59 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1GlhaH-00087k-UJ@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).