From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:14:03 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GkBDv-00022W-7e@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BAY112-F9AD99E25C3E1AF679749FDAEB0@phx.gbl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163573351 30113 80.91.229.2 (15 Nov 2006 06:49:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 06:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 15 07:49:06 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkEa1-0006x4-K9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:49:05 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkEa2-0003Ps-14
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:49:06 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkEZI-0002eV-JY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:48:20 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkEZH-0002bn-Ds
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:48:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkEZH-0002ba-B4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:48:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GkEZG-0001Su-JA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:48:18 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GkBDv-00022W-7e; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:14:03 -0500
Original-To: "Herbert Euler" <herberteuler@hotmail.com>
In-reply-to: <BAY112-F9AD99E25C3E1AF679749FDAEB0@phx.gbl>
	(herberteuler@hotmail.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62323
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/62323>

There is no conflict between use of define-minor-mode
and implementing a variable at C level.