* defconst -> risky-local-variable
@ 2006-11-06 10:10 Juanma Barranquero
2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2006-11-06 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
Shouldn't the docs for `defconst' mention (either in the docstring,
the Emacs Lisp Reference, or both) that it sets the SYMBOL's
risky-local-variable property to t?
--
/L/e/k/t/u
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: defconst -> risky-local-variable
2006-11-06 10:10 defconst -> risky-local-variable Juanma Barranquero
@ 2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2006-11-06 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Shouldn't the docs for `defconst' mention (either in the docstring,
the Emacs Lisp Reference, or both) that it sets the SYMBOL's
risky-local-variable property to t?
No, that is an implementation detail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: defconst -> risky-local-variable
2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
2006-11-08 4:17 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2006-11-06 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
On 11/6/06, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>> that it sets the SYMBOL's risky-local-variable property to t?
> No, that is an implementation detail.
Curious. In general, risky-local-variable is a feature, not an
implementation detail; and setting risky-local-variable for a defconst
isn't really necessary (implementation-wise). So I guess I don't
understand the rationale.
/L/e/k/t/u
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: defconst -> risky-local-variable
2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2006-11-08 4:17 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2006-11-08 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Curious. In general, risky-local-variable is a feature, not an
implementation detail; and setting risky-local-variable for a defconst
isn't really necessary (implementation-wise). So I guess I don't
understand the rationale.
We don't need to document all the details of what might put on that
property.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-08 4:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-06 10:10 defconst -> risky-local-variable Juanma Barranquero
2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman
2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
2006-11-08 4:17 ` Richard Stallman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).