From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.fortran,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gfortran error format (was: Re: Emacs and GFortran) Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:38:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <19c433eb0611020608v3695ef7ex7cbe998347760d19@mail.gmail.com> <20061103075450.GA2526@acclab.helsinki.fi> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162622342 22547 80.91.229.2 (4 Nov 2006 06:39:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 06:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fxcoudert@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, wt@atmos.colostate.edu, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: fortran-return-15466-gcgf-fortran=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 04 07:39:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcgf-fortran@gmane.org Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GgFAX-0008CO-VE for gcgf-fortran@gmane.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:38:29 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 30949 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2006 06:38:16 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 30940 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2006 06:38:15 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 06:38:14 +0000 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GgFAQ-0003hb-Av; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:38:10 -0500 Original-To: Erik Edelmann In-reply-to: <20061103075450.GA2526@acclab.helsinki.fi> (message from Erik Edelmann on Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:54:50 +0200) Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Original-Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15437 gmane.emacs.devel:61741 Archived-At: We will, sooner or later. But there are 123 other bugs (enhancement requests not counted) in Bugzilla for Gfortran right now. They need to be fixed too. We see no reason to give higher priority to this bug than to the others. I understand you can't fix all bugs right away. Since I don't know what those other bugs are, I have no opinion on their relative priority. But that is not the crucial point. The crucial point here is to give this bug a substantial positive priority -- to acknowledge that this is "something we need to fix" rather than "you users can fix it if you like". It doesn't have to be highest priority, but it does have to be substantial and positive.