From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [arit93@yahoo.com: vc-svn.el and "the underscore hack"]
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:14:55 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Gf5d1-0001N3-HW@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1GZiqe-0002L9-Ls@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<17735.25421.968000.773096@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162399482 22214 80.91.229.2 (1 Nov 2006 16:44:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:44:42 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 01 17:44:41 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GfJCe-0004as-28
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:44:36 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GfJCd-0008Bj-I6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:44:35 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GfJA3-0005K4-VD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:41:56 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GfJA3-0005JX-9q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:41:55 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJA3-0005JH-38
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:41:55 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GfJA2-0004VA-Qn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:41:54 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GfJA1-0001m9-7Q; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:41:53 -0500
Original-to: emacs-devel@gnu.org, spiegel@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <17735.25421.968000.773096@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (message from
	AriT93 on Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:53:01 -0600)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61562
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61562>

We have been waiting a month for someone to look at this patch
and determine whether it is correct.  Stefan, can you check?
If Stefan doesn't, would someone else please do so?