From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Another keybinding nit for afterwards
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:18:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GehKZ-0004bE-42@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <85d58dpjbd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<E1Gdsgh-0004Ea-Eu@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m33b95294b.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <85y7qxj0ar.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162253916 22855 80.91.229.2 (31 Oct 2006 00:18:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:18:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 31 01:18:32 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GehKo-0005KN-Tb
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:18:32 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GehKo-0003X1-9U
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:18:30 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GehKb-0003WY-9U
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:18:17 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GehKa-0003WM-SS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:18:17 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GehKa-0003WJ-PK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:18:16 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GehKa-0008FY-QH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:18:16 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GehKZ-0004bE-42; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:18:15 -0500
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <85y7qxj0ar.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:22:36 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61443
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61443>

The need for a poll about a proposed change has nothing to do with how
much WORK it takes to implement the change.  It is because an
incompatible change can make users unhappy.