From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Pretest
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:45:56 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GeFfQ-0007bU-85@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87lkn1tzav.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<m3lkn1r1ly.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <umz7gu1to.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162147648 25844 80.91.229.2 (29 Oct 2006 18:47:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:47:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 29 19:47:27 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFgf-0006w1-7w
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:47:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFge-00023N-Lu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:47:12 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFfT-0000X6-NK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:45:59 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeFfT-0000Vc-52
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:45:59 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeFfS-0000V7-Q0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:45:58 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GeFfS-0001qf-Ma
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:45:58 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GeFfQ-0007bU-85; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:45:56 -0500
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <umz7gu1to.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 28
	Oct 2006 13:17:23 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61340
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61340>

It makes no sense to post a delta for the first pretest,
because that would be almost as big as the sources.
However, we should post deltas for subsequent pretests
from the first pretest.