From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Pretest
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:24 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Ge98O-0007N2-QM@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87lkn1tzav.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4543389E.3090006@gnu.org>
	<ubqnwtwdr.fsf@gnu.org> <4543CFDF.1060605@gnu.org>
	<uvem3spzq.fsf@gnu.org> <45448DB1.8080800@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162122469 22267 80.91.229.2 (29 Oct 2006 11:47:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 29 12:47:47 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ge98d-0005BT-K4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:47:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ge98d-0002hM-4O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:39 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ge98R-0002gb-Ay
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:27 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ge98P-0002fx-Ri
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:26 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ge98P-0002fh-LL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:25 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Ge98P-00059j-NG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:25 -0500
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ge98O-0007N2-QM; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:24 -0500
Original-To: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <45448DB1.8080800@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Sun, 29
	Oct 2006 11:17:05 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61334
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61334>

> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:17:05 +0000
> From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
> Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> > So that, whenever temacs.exe is rebuilt (meaning that some C file has
> > changed), DOC is regenerated by "make install".
> >   
> Then wouldn't it be better to build DOC after temacs?

Yes (that's what the Unix build does), but I'm reluctant to do that
now, since it would be a major change in the Windows build procedure.

> Otherwise we lag behind by one build, since temacs does not get
> modified until after the DOC file is generated.

Why does it have to be modified?  What kind of information about DOC
is recorded in temacs?