From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: highlight-changes-mode
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:07 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Gc4hX-0002mC-0K@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17721.60660.980363.609046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<E1Gbs6N-0000A6-2t@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161628895 27747 80.91.229.2 (23 Oct 2006 18:41:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Richard Sharman <rsharman@pobox.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 23 20:41:30 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gc4it-000598-U3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:40:32 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gc4it-0003rO-IL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:40:31 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gc4hZ-0003Df-E2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:09 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gc4hY-0003Ci-R9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gc4hY-0003CZ-Fp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gc4hY-0000WS-IF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:08 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Gc4hX-0002mC-0K; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:07 -0400
Original-to: nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1Gbs6N-0000A6-2t@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:11:55 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61056
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61056>

Is there an important reason to overload M-x highlight-changes-mode
for toggling between active and passive mode?  Would it be
inconvenient to make that a separate command, so that M-x
highlight-changes-mode could follow the conventions for minor modes?