From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Keybinding nit
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:56:57 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GaXSD-0006Xl-0C@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <85d58p7hyu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161262663 19011 80.91.229.2 (19 Oct 2006 12:57:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:57:43 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 19 14:57:42 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaXSb-0007Zz-Bk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:57:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaXSa-0001Nr-Pw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:57:20 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaXSF-0001Lx-AS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:56:59 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaXSE-0001KP-52
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:56:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaXSD-0001KC-V2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:56:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GaXSE-0006xX-4j
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:56:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GaXSD-0006Xl-0C; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:56:57 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <85d58p7hyu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:37:45 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60923
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/60923>

    C-x 4 0 and C-x 5 0 are not at all symmetric, and C-x 4 0 is not
    really intuitive.

    Maybe one should rather have C-x 4 k and C-x 5 k for killing both
    buffer and window/frame?

Since C-x k reads a buffer name, I would expect C-x 4 k to
read a buffer name also.