From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Bug Database?
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:41:13 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GaRab-0003ye-Uf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17717.20433.183356.106695@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<E1Ga8sE-00071j-5u@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<17718.15996.727727.91417@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161240699 32303 80.91.229.2 (19 Oct 2006 06:51:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:51:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 19 08:51:39 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaRkc-00037Q-1K
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:51:34 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaRka-00011m-U1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:51:32 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaRkO-0000zC-55
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:51:20 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GaRkN-0000wq-4X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:51:19 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaRkM-0000wa-P7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:51:18 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GaRag-0006ZU-4m
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:41:18 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GaRab-0003ye-Uf; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:41:15 -0400
Original-To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <17718.15996.727727.91417@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from
	Nick Roberts on Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:47:24 +1300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60905
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/60905>

     > I suspect it means there is insufficient priority to fixing GDB bugs.

    It depends how you measure things.  They have more people using a recent
    version of GDB and more people fixing bugs.

I don't understand what you mean by that.