From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [mange@freemail.hu: Use tls.el instead of ssl.el for HTTPS?]
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:50:39 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GZSrX-0005ba-QO@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1GZ9XV-0006mD-Vx@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<871wp9mpqk.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161006736 811 80.91.229.2 (16 Oct 2006 13:52:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:52:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: mange@freemail.hu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 16 15:52:15 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GZSsy-0004Ht-0s
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:52:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GZSsx-0002TY-HF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:52:07 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GZSrb-0000m2-Hl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:50:43 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GZSrZ-0000kC-PB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:50:42 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZSrZ-0000jR-BU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:50:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GZT0h-0007z5-5I
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:00:07 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GZSrX-0005ba-QO; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:50:39 -0400
Original-To: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
In-reply-to: <871wp9mpqk.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (message from Simon
	Josefsson on Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:51:47 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60787
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/60787>

    It is probably bad to prefer ssl.el over tls.el in Emacs code, since
    many people have old ssl.el laying around, and they may work less well
    than tls.el.

If URL works fine with tls.el, let's change it now to stop using ssl.
Magnus, would you please do that?

Simon, do you think we should move ssl.el to obsolete?