From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: need option so line-move-to-column ignores fields, plus patch Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:48:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2cd46e7f0608310848l743430e9ia7a1d45e22428083@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609032143v311b670dra2d2ef679dd936@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609041256q73c0c0d3s7631a964ae9a8367@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609060952m54601787x8c91412af7fbf69f@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609070747o5028d2bewd5a9e79a5afd4a46@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609231629hf2187cbl7e46507ee6070422@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609241317p1656abcdh84b801af14bd8e84@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159217353 31513 80.91.229.2 (25 Sep 2006 20:49:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 25 22:49:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRxO0-00013F-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:49:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRxO0-0002ee-Gw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRxNW-0002TO-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:48:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRxNW-0002Sp-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:48:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRxNV-0002Sj-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:48:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GRxRz-0004R5-R2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GRxNT-0005wa-KD; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:48:36 -0400 Original-To: "Ken Manheimer" In-reply-to: <2cd46e7f0609241317p1656abcdh84b801af14bd8e84@mail.gmail.com> (ken.manheimer@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60211 Archived-At: > | 5. Backwards in the same situation moves it to the right of the bar. > > That is correct behavior. that is not the behavior i need, and don't see why it is desirable - particularly since it's the opposite of the behavior you agreed to when advancing - ie, #4, just above. Sorry, I misread it before. You are right: when point starts in the field, it should move up into the previous line's field.