From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: jit-lock simplification?
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:24:56 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GNaLw-00083R-Od@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m37j083qeb.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<jwvac539ax9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m3wt873mh4.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158175672 25536 80.91.229.2 (13 Sep 2006 19:27:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:27:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 13 21:27:49 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNaOT-0003cp-AO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:27:33 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNaOS-0005gO-Rg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:27:32 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNaLz-0001rd-Eu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:24:59 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNaLz-0001qp-0J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:24:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNaLy-0001qU-H8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:24:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GNaNl-0000J4-3j
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:26:49 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GNaLw-00083R-Od; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:24:57 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3wt873mh4.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59794
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59794>

I think it is clearer for maintenance if the timer function
has a name.