From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Behavior of `this-command-keys'
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:10:09 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GNWNN-0005zp-S4@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87hczel26d.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu>
	<E1GMxaC-0002QV-4U@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87hczdyr5w.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158160296 31698 80.91.229.2 (13 Sep 2006 15:11:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:11:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: belanger@truman.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 13 17:11:36 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNWOU-0003hb-Hi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:11:18 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNWOU-0000jm-0J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:11:18 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNWNR-0008Dd-55
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:10:13 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNWNP-0008Al-8V
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:10:11 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNWNO-0008AL-OO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:10:10 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GNWP8-0001Ke-Mx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:11:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GNWNN-0005zp-S4; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:10:09 -0400
Original-To: belanger@truman.edu
In-reply-to: <87hczdyr5w.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> (message from Jay Belanger
	on Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:40:27 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59777
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59777>

    > It seems that the documentation of this-command-keys is wrong.  Its
    > value seems to include any keys that were read by read-event.

    I take it that's the desired value, then.

Yes, I think it was intentional.  I believe my patch restores
the behavior as of before the sit-for change.