From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Any problems with this patch?
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:19 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GMxaR-0002Sq-5P@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <85pse2fjo4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158026527 6357 80.91.229.2 (12 Sep 2006 02:02:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 12 04:02:05 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMxb1-00078X-QG
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:01:56 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMxb1-00016r-CX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:55 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMxaT-0000wN-3y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:21 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMxaS-0000vw-G1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:20 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMxaS-0000vp-A9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:20 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMxbq-0000jP-Lf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:02:46 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GMxaR-0002Sq-5P; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:19 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <85pse2fjo4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:32:43 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59719
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59719>

    In order to get consistent treatment of local-map/keymap properties, I
    would like to check in the following change.

Would you please describe the intended change in behavior more
concretely?  Just saying it is "consistent" does not explain what the
behavior is.