From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: The order input events are processed.
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:12:01 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GMmW1-0001zC-8H@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87odtrrkgh.fsf@lrde.org> <E1GM9hu-0003Ha-57@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87ejukt7fe.fsf@lrde.org> <E1GMOzg-0007mG-6L@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87zmd7x3qk.fsf@lrde.org> <m3zmd78l8g.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157984001 27933 80.91.229.2 (11 Sep 2006 14:13:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:13:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 11 16:13:20 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMmXB-0005w7-Ik
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:13:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMmXA-0007pl-RY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:13:12 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMmW5-00073v-9L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:12:05 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GMmW4-000736-H8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:12:04 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMmW4-000731-62
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:12:04 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMmXL-00089W-Rl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:13:23 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GMmW1-0001zC-8H; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:12:01 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3zmd78l8g.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59681
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59681>

    It used unread-post-input-method-events instead of unread-command-events
    to ensure that the event is pushed back on the first list of events
    processed by read-event.

That change is not right, I think.  Using
unread-post-input-method-events instead of unread-command-events
alters the way the events are processed: it does goto reread_first
instead of goto reread_for_input_method.

With your change (or my change), we know that these lists are
empty when read-event is called.  That being so, I think it is fine
to put the event back in unread-command-events.