From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The order input events are processed. Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:45:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87odtrrkgh.fsf@lrde.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157834872 12542 80.91.229.2 (9 Sep 2006 20:47:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 09 22:47:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GM9jx-00060Q-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:47:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GM9jx-0003iQ-AC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GM9hy-0001oV-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GM9hx-0001ny-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:45:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GM9hx-0001nr-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:45:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GM9ir-0004zI-4I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:46:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GM9hu-0003Ha-57; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:45:42 -0400 Original-To: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) In-reply-to: <87odtrrkgh.fsf@lrde.org> (michael.cadilhac@lrde.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59603 Archived-At: The whole point of unread-post-input-method-events is to be processed first. Changing it to operate last will break it. When an input method runs and generates a sequence of several events, those events must be processed before whatever is in unread-command-events. We need to fix the bug, but not by changing the meaning of this feature. One way to fix it is for sit_for to test these variables directly so that it doesn't need to change them. Does anyone see a problem with that? Would someone like to implement that?