* fringe indicators
@ 2006-09-08 9:31 Nick Roberts
2006-09-08 9:56 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-08 15:12 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 2006-09-08 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
I find the sometimes the fringe is too noisy and it's hard to see the overlay
arrow. How about subduing the truncation and continuation line indicators by
using the shadow face?
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: fringe indicators
2006-09-08 9:31 fringe indicators Nick Roberts
@ 2006-09-08 9:56 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-08 15:12 ` Richard Stallman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kim F. Storm @ 2006-09-08 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz> writes:
> I find the sometimes the fringe is too noisy and it's hard to see the overlay
> arrow. How about subduing the truncation and continuation line indicators by
> using the shadow face?
Or some other face -- but not now!
--
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: fringe indicators
2006-09-08 9:31 fringe indicators Nick Roberts
2006-09-08 9:56 ` Kim F. Storm
@ 2006-09-08 15:12 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-08 22:36 ` Nick Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2006-09-08 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
I find the sometimes the fringe is too noisy and it's hard to see the overlay
arrow. How about subduing the truncation and continuation line indicators by
using the shadow face?
Please let's stick to fixing bugs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: fringe indicators
2006-09-08 15:12 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2006-09-08 22:36 ` Nick Roberts
2006-09-09 20:45 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-09 20:46 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 2006-09-08 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Richard Stallman writes:
> I find the sometimes the fringe is too noisy and it's hard to see the overlay
> arrow. How about subduing the truncation and continuation line indicators by
> using the shadow face?
>
> Please let's stick to fixing bugs.
It was just a five minute change, anyway here's a bug:
The manual says:
-- Variable: indicate-buffer-boundaries
...
There are four kinds of basic values:
...
ANYTHING-ELSE
Display the icon at the top of the window top in the left
fringe, and other in the right fringe.
Perhaps that should say
Display the angle icon at the top of the window in the left
fringe, and at the bottom of the window in the right fringe.
A value of t seems to display an angle item angle icons at the top and bottom
of the window but both in the left fringe.
Also it doesn't make sense to say ANYTHING-ELSE and then go on to say what
further values mean:
If value is a cons `(ANGLES . ARROWS)', ANGLES controls the angle
icons, and ARROWS controls the arrows. Both ANGLES and ARROWS...
Perhaps ANYTHING-ELSE should be t and this should be equivalent to (t . nil)
or perhaps ANYTHING-ELSE should be (ANGLES . ARROWS).
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-09 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-08 9:31 fringe indicators Nick Roberts
2006-09-08 9:56 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-08 15:12 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-08 22:36 ` Nick Roberts
2006-09-09 20:45 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-09 20:46 ` Richard Stallman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).