From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: gnus makes emacs lose response
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:56:30 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GLeyE-0007QY-Pn@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3wt8kuiqd.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<871wqqxba5.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<jwvfyf6ko2k.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87ejunflvz.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157716940 15093 80.91.229.2 (8 Sep 2006 12:02:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: sdl.web@googlemail.com, no-spam@cua.dk, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 08 14:02:19 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLf3e-0008BR-R3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:02:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLf3e-0001dn-7K
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:02:06 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLeyH-00015D-5G
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:56:33 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLeyG-000145-IO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:56:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLeyG-00013a-C0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:56:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GLeyq-0007sT-4E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:57:08 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GLeyE-0007QY-Pn; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:56:30 -0400
Original-To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
In-reply-to: <87ejunflvz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:43:28 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59556
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59556>

    Unless the hang in the select system call prevents C-g from calling
    interrupt_signal in the first place, which we couldn't possibly do
    anything about.

If that is true, it is a serious kernel bug.  Can anyone verify that
that is true?