From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp: Re: silent PC vs. emacs]
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:15:33 -0400
Message-ID: <E1GLRDh-0000rP-N2@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1GKXSf-0002dX-EV@fencepost.gnu.org> <upsea5fec.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157664042 31193 80.91.229.2 (7 Sep 2006 21:20:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:20:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 07 23:20:41 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLRIS-0006cS-FO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:20:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLRIR-0000PO-SS
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:20:27 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLRDl-0006Wm-2G
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:15:37 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLRDk-0006V4-Ef
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:15:36 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLRDk-0006Un-9U
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:15:36 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GLREB-0006gO-VM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:16:04 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GLRDh-0000rP-N2; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:15:33 -0400
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <upsea5fec.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 05
	Sep 2006 21:36:59 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59530
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59530>

    I don't see anything wrong, but I recommend very much that we leave
    this alone until after the release.  I suspect it will be another
    instance of the sit-for change.

I think we should install that patch, if it makes a substantial difference
for laptop power drain.  Would someone test that?