From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: juri@jurta.org, ken.manheimer@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
storm@cua.dk
Subject: Re: cursor doesn't show through transparent images in emacs 22, unlike emacs 21
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:54:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1GLDlw-0001Rq-Lq@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <851wqpgxtp.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:15:46 +0200)
There is no sensible default. What is useful as a mask depends on the
image in question. Using heuristic-mask can mean that the whole image
flashes, but it can also mean that just a single corner pixel blinks.
1. So what? Another default can't be worse than the present one,
and it would be better MOST of the time.
2. Maybe we need another possible :mask value which would specify
drawing the cursor in the way that you suggested.
3. If #2 is too complex to do now, maybe we should make it an error to
fail to specify :mask on an image on a character in the buffer.
That is simple.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-02 18:08 (no subject) Richard Stallman
2006-09-03 21:30 ` cursor doesn't show through transparent images in emacs 22, unlike emacs 21 Kim F. Storm
2006-09-04 17:17 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-04 22:42 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-06 8:49 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-06 9:15 ` David Kastrup
2006-09-06 10:00 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-06 16:12 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-09-07 6:54 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2006-09-07 7:47 ` David Kastrup
2006-09-09 20:45 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-09 22:55 ` David Kastrup
2006-09-10 0:21 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-10 13:04 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-10 20:25 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-10 23:00 ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-09-11 5:32 ` tomas
2006-09-11 8:08 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-11 8:16 ` David Kastrup
2006-09-11 11:56 ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-09-11 12:51 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-09-11 14:40 ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-09-11 14:11 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-18 23:22 Ken Manheimer
2006-08-18 23:33 ` Drew Adams
2006-08-19 17:49 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-19 23:09 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-20 1:49 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-20 5:00 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-20 6:42 ` David Kastrup
2006-08-20 12:05 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-20 15:10 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-20 17:27 ` David Kastrup
2006-08-22 3:09 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-22 8:03 ` David Kastrup
2006-08-22 13:45 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-24 11:31 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-24 11:49 ` David Kastrup
2006-08-25 13:48 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-24 14:20 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-24 14:26 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-24 15:53 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-24 19:56 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-24 21:41 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-25 14:28 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-25 15:24 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-26 10:08 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-25 20:23 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-25 22:35 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-26 12:22 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-26 21:37 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-27 14:34 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-27 20:37 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-27 21:45 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-28 22:10 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-28 22:27 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-29 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-28 22:33 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-27 20:42 ` Juri Linkov
2006-08-27 22:24 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-28 21:27 ` Juri Linkov
2006-08-28 22:09 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-28 22:44 ` Juri Linkov
2006-08-28 23:02 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-29 21:31 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-29 21:36 ` David Kastrup
2006-08-29 22:12 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-30 17:58 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-30 18:20 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-31 18:16 ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-01 15:46 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-29 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-29 20:27 ` Juri Linkov
2006-08-30 8:09 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-31 7:33 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-27 22:23 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-28 22:10 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-25 23:01 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-26 12:22 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-22 13:19 ` Ken Manheimer
2006-08-20 9:03 ` Jason Rumney
2006-08-20 9:09 ` David Kastrup
2006-08-20 12:05 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1GLDlw-0001Rq-Lq@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=juri@jurta.org \
--cc=ken.manheimer@gmail.com \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).