From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man' Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:49:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874pvy0wik.fsf@jurta.org> <87zmdhzusd.fsf@jurta.org> <878xkzz1i0.fsf@jurta.org> <87hcznvv8m.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> <87d5abvuzk.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> <878xkzvsrm.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157533202 10394 80.91.229.2 (6 Sep 2006 09:00:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 06 11:00:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKtFr-0000Df-Qn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:59:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKtFr-00034X-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GKt6Z-000831-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GKt6Y-00081p-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKt6Y-00081Z-KU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GKt6f-0002WJ-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GKt6X-0005P0-QQ; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:49:53 -0400 Original-To: Michael Welsh Duggan In-reply-to: <878xkzvsrm.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> (message from Michael Welsh Duggan on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:31:25 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59425 Archived-At: Some time later, I am realizing that string_match_1 is using current_buffer's case table. Since the string being matched against might have nothing to do with the current buffer, this seems incorrect. Is this a red herring? I think it is not the main problem here. You are right that it is unclean in principle to use the buffer's case table; but it makes no difference in practice.