unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:49:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1GKt6C-0005Mg-0h@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBAELKDEAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>

    If you should happen to evaluate `run-with-idle-timer' more than once using
    the same arguments, then a different timer (vector) would be created and run
    for each evaluation. If you assigned the result of `run-with-idle-timer' to
    a variable (setq or defvar), then passing that variable to `cancel-timer'
    would cancel only the timer that was last created with those arguments to
    `run-with-idle-timer' (and assigned to the variable).

    I don't know - is that a feature or not?

It is the way Lisp works.  If you want to remember more than one
object, and operate on them, you can keep them in a list.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-06  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-05  0:14 Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'? Drew Adams
2006-09-05  1:44 ` Miles Bader
2006-09-05 15:38   ` Stefan Monnier
2006-09-05 16:20     ` Drew Adams
2006-09-05 17:22       ` Stefan Monnier
2006-09-05 17:36         ` Drew Adams
2006-09-05 20:46           ` Kevin Rodgers
2006-09-05 21:24             ` Drew Adams
2006-09-06  1:11               ` Miles Bader
2006-09-06  2:09                 ` Drew Adams
2006-09-06  2:38                   ` Miles Bader
2006-09-06  6:31                     ` Drew Adams
2006-09-06  6:48                       ` Miles Bader
2006-09-06  7:29                       ` David Kastrup
2006-09-06 14:00                       ` Stefan Monnier
2006-09-06 15:27                         ` Drew Adams
2006-09-06  6:38                   ` David Kastrup
2006-09-05 21:56     ` David Kastrup
2006-09-06  0:59       ` Stefan Monnier
2006-09-06 19:05     ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-05 19:13 ` Stuart D. Herring
2006-09-05 19:22   ` Drew Adams
2006-09-06  8:49 ` Richard Stallman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1GKt6C-0005Mg-0h@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).