From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [rudalics@gmx.at: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu] Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:57:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8764gcde3n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878xl754fy.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <44F5D914.3020604@gmx.at> <87u03tkasn.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <44F67D80.4010800@gmx.at> <87d5ahm4l3.fsf@furball.mit.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157065109 16170 80.91.229.2 (31 Aug 2006 22:58:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 00:58:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIvUO-0002u9-OH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:58:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIvUO-0006PB-Be for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GIvTe-0005iF-T1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GIvTe-0005hA-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIvTe-0005h1-0g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GIvdM-0002gl-F4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GIvTb-0003LY-QG; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:57:35 -0400 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-reply-to: <87d5ahm4l3.fsf@furball.mit.edu> (message from Chong Yidong on Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:12:40 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59186 Archived-At: > Can't we just install Martin's patch and get closer to the pretest?? If RMS is fine with it. I was hoping to install a change that would be smaller and more isolated to reduce the risk. If people agree Martin's patch is correct, then it is ok to install that. I don't remember if he wrote changes for the manual; if not, then would someone please do that?