From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Nested sit-for's Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:13:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y7tp90i1.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87hd0bjvoi.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <44E493E0.5000205@gmx.at> <44E58248.7020202@gmx.at> <87irknqzpv.fsf@furball.mit.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156159009 7348 80.91.229.2 (21 Aug 2006 11:16:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 21 13:16:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GF7lm-0007Qu-J2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:16:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GF7ll-0001ei-Rs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GF7iZ-0006Bu-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:13:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GF7iY-00069b-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GF7iX-00069V-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GF7pu-0005UI-Bg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:20:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GF7iV-0001jl-T2; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:13:15 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58621 Archived-At: IIUC, the recent addition of current-idle-time by RMS was supposed to fix the sit-for in jit-lock problem in a different way. But so far, RMS' changes to jit-lock have not been installed... What's up??? Someone else proposed a different change to the same part of jit-lock, and I have not had time (while sufficiently alert) to study that, so I don't have any idea which solution is better. I sent my changes to the list yesterday; what do others think about them?