From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: BASE_PURESIZE
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:51:36 -0400
Message-ID: <E1G9RFI-0001nZ-Er@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17619.65430.612339.318495@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<uirl7ldsp.fsf@gnu.org> <v91wrv40dt.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154803924 11085 80.91.229.2 (5 Aug 2006 18:52:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 05 20:52:02 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G9RFV-0003df-Nd
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:51:49 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G9RFV-0007TQ-L5
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:51:49 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G9RFL-0007Sg-It
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:51:39 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G9RFK-0007Rm-UV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:51:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9RFK-0007RW-Qb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:51:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G9RJA-0002w1-NF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:55:36 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1G9RFI-0001nZ-Er; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:51:36 -0400
Original-To: Reiner Steib <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>
In-reply-to: <v91wrv40dt.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (message from Reiner
	Steib on Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:23:42 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58128
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/58128>

    Unless we find (and fix) the reason for the different pure space
    requirements, it would be good to increase BASE_PURESIZE to an amount
    that allows building Emacs without an overflow on most machines, I
    think.

How much increase do you propose?