From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow. Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 09:58:40 +0900 Message-ID: References: <44D19F77.4050904@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154656043 15279 80.91.229.2 (4 Aug 2006 01:47:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 01:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-unicode@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, duncanmak@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 04 03:47:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8omF-00026G-LQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:47:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8omE-0008Qc-TM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G8om2-0008QN-NA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G8om1-0008QB-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8om1-0008Px-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.29.246.133] (helo=mx1.aist.go.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G8opR-0006r1-Sj; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:50:22 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.12]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k740xick021940; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:59:47 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k740xdii024983; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:59:41 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1G8o1Q-0003Bq-00; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 09:58:40 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:22 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58075 Archived-At: In article , Richard Stallman writes: > 1026 is 0x402, 1280 is 0x500. What is the good value for > NSTATICS this time; 0x600 or 0x602? > Try 0x7f0. That should fit nicely in a block that malloc can get > with no wasted space. Thank you. I've just installed that change. By the way, is it true that allocating "Lisp_Object *staticvec" dynamically (i.e. by malloc and realloc) doesn't work? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org